An approach to the measurement of risk perception in decision making in aquaculture in Sonora, Mexico
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46588/invurnus.v15i3.31Keywords:
exploitation, ways of thinking, profitability, decision makingAbstract
Shrimp aquaculture production presents associated natural risks; onslaught of epizootics, low international prices, and strong international competition. These are relevant causes that have impacted on the decrease in the profitability of shrimp producing units. This analysis addresses another aspect that eventually affects your performance. Such are the ways in which shrimp producers, their team of managers and technicians, make decisions, and how they face the risks inherent in this activity. Product of thought heuristics, cognitive biases and the limited rationality of individuals, in areas of incomplete, inadequate or outdated information, the decision making of these economic agents is nuanced with the challenge of keeping the economic unit in operation. In order to distinguish the ways of thinking that decision makers see and find an instrument that allows to measure risk perception, a systematic review is carried out, which explores the theoretical aspects and their findings on coping with extreme risk. The Prospective Theory of Kahneman and Tversky (1979), is the starting point to establish a clear parameter that those heuristics inherent to human rationality.
Downloads
References
Ariely, D. 2009. Predictably irrational, revised and expanded edition, Harper Collings Publishers, London.
Bartolini Rosales J. L. y Torres García P. 2004. La camaronicultura en México. Revista Ciencias UNAM. No. 76. Octubre-diciembre. 2004.
Higuera I. y Chavez M. 2013. Manual de Buenas Prácticas de Producción Acuícola de Camarón para la Inocuidad Alimentaria, CIAD AC, SENASICA. ISBN: 968-5384-04-5
CONAPESCA 2017. Anuario Estadístico 2017. México: SAGARPA.
Bastidas Plaza Héctor Eduardo. 2006. El fideicomiso como mecanismo de garantía y medio de captación de recursos para el procesamiento y comercialización del camarón”. Tesis Licenciatura, Facultad de Ciencias Humanísticas y Económicas. Escuela Superior Politécnica Del Litoral. Guayaquil, Ecuador. 220 p.
FAO 2005. DOCUMENTO TÉCNICO DE PESCA 476 Introducciones y movimiento de dos especies de camarones peneidos en Asia y el Pacífico
FAO 2019. GLOBEFISH - Información y Análisis sobre el Comercio Mundial de Pescado. Recuperado de: http://www.fao.org/in-action/globefish/marketreports/resource-detail/es/c/1241384/.
FIRA 2020. Dirección de Investigación y evaluación Económica y Sectorial. Perspectivas.
Gigerenzer, G. 2011. Heuristic Decision Making, The Annual Review of Psychology, online at psych.annualreviews.org.
Gómez-Gil B., Roque A., y Guerra-Flores A.L. 2001. Enfermedades Infecciosas más comunes en la camaronicultura en México y el impacto del uso de antimicrobianos. México. En: Páez-Osuna F (ed) camaronicultura y medio ambiente.ICMyL-UNAM.
Kahneman, D y Tversky, A. 1979. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk, Ecomometrica, Vol. 47, Marzo; No. 2 Pags. 263-291.
Kahneman, D. 2012. Pensar rápido, pensar despacio books. google.com
Lagarda-Leyva, Ernesto A. 2016. Evaluación del desempeño de la cadena de suministro del camarón blanco de agua dulce. Revista Internacional Administración & Finanzas, v. 9 (1) p. 33-55.
Lawson, M. A. Larrick, R.P., Soll, J.B. 2020. Comparing fast thinking and slow thinking: The relative benefits of interventions, individual differences, and inferential rules./Judgment and Decision Making, Vol. 15, No. 5, September 2020, pp. 660–684
Lipshitz, R. y Strauss, O. (1997). Coping with Uncertainty: A Naturalistic Decision-Making Analysis Organizational behavior and human decision processes. Vol. 69, No. 2, February, pp. 149–163, Article No. OB972679.
Lopez-Tellez, Norma A. 2020. History, Impact, and Status of Infectious Diseases of the Pacific White Shrimp Penaeus vannamei (Bonne, 1831) Cultivated in Mexico. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society. Volume 51, Issue 2, Page 334.
López-Vázquez E, Marván ML. 2004. Validación de una escala de afrontamiento frente a riesgos extremos. Salud Publica Mex 2004;46:216-22
Mullainathan, S. y Thaler, R. 2000. Behavioral Economics, National Bureau of Economic Research, working paper 7948.
Muñoz Palma, M., Avilés Ochoa, E., Miranda Espinoza, E.L., 2016. La Lógica Difusa para la evaluación económica y financiera de opciones cambiarias: El caso de la producción acuícola. / International Journal of Information Systems and Software Engineering for Big Companies.
Moynihan T. , 2000. Coping with ‘requirements-uncertainty’: the theories-of-action of experienced IS/ software project managers. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0164-1212(00)00049-2
Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Alimentación y la Agricultura (FA0, 2016). Visión general del sector acuícola nacional, México. http://www.fao.org/fishery/countrysector/naso_mexico/es
Schirrmeister, E., Göhring A-L., Warnke, P. 2016. Psychological biases and heuristics in the context of foresight and scenario processes.
SIACON, 2019. Sistema de Información Agroalimentaria de Consulta. https://www.gob.mx/siap/documentos/siaconng-161430
Stoner, J. y Freeman, E. 2000. Administración. México. Editorial Prentice-Hall.
USTIC, 2020. United States International Trade Comission. Recuperado de https://www.usitc.gov/
